 Osama's Threat, Katrina's Warning This city's destruction had 48 hours warning. Next time, it could be far different. |  | | John Pendygraft | | Soldiers check that a burning home in the Garden District of New Orleans is vacant, during the rash of fires that plagued the largely abandoned city. |
|
 | | David J. Phillip | | Recovery officials in protective suits remove a body from a home a dog follows after floodwaters from Hurricane Katrina receeded revealing a layer of mud in St. Bernard Parish near New Orleans. |
|
| By SCOTT BATES Published on 9/11/2005Hurricane Katrina did what no foreign enemy has ever done in our history, it destroyed an entire American city. While the loss of life is still unknown, most estimates put the death toll in the low thousands. It is hard to imagine the loss of life and chaos if there had not been over 48 hours warning of impending disaster.
But the next time an American city meets with catastrophe there may well be no warning.
Since the attacks of Sept. 11, we have been on notice that al-Qaida intends to destroy a major American city. In 1998, Osama bin Ladin said that it is a “religious duty” for his terrorists to gain possession of an atomic bomb. Following this call to action, al-Qaida operatives have attempted to secure nuclear bomb making materials, met with Pakistani nuclear scientists and experimented with chemical and biological weapons in their camps in Afghanistan.
The 9/11 Commission reported that bin Ladin had called for a “Hiroshima type event” on American soil. Since then, bin Ladin received a “fatwa” or religious ruling from a Saudi cleric justifying the use of weapons of mass destruction against America to kill “10 million.” One year ago bin Ladin issued his “final warning” to America, the last step necessary in his self-justification to deliver a catastrophic attack on an American city.
The evidence is overwhelming that the next time that an America city is threatened with destruction, it may well come from terrorists who will not give us the warning New Orleans received before the hurricane. Katrina has shown us that the Department of Homeland Security, the very agency that would be in charge of preventing and responding to a catastrophic terrorist attack in America, is not ready to carry out its mission. Change must take place now, for if DHS responds to a catastrophic terrorist strike as it has to Katrina, the loss of life could be beyond our imaginings.
We must plan now to save American lives tomorrow. Katrina has provided us with a road map to reform rescue efforts. The weaknesses of our government's response to Katrina can be summed up as a lack of security, supplies and synchronization.
Security is essential for any relief operation. The stunning breakdown of law and order in New Orleans prevented the delivery of relief supplies and the evacuation of victims. It is easy to imagine that panic and chaos from a terrorist attack on an American city that involved chemical, nuclear or biological weapons such an event would far exceed what we have just witnessed in New Orleans. In the aftermath of a catastrophic attack, the maintenance of law and order would be essential for immediate mass evacuations, organization of relief operations and protection of the victims left behind.
To provide better security in future disasters, we should designate the National Guard as the America's foremost homeland security force. While riot ruled the streets of New Orleans, one half of Louisiana's National Guard forces were deployed overseas. If President Bush wants to continue the occupation of Iraq he should do so primarily with the regular U.S. Army and stop deploying National Guard units for year long stints on the other side of the planet. The war on terror will be won by playing an aggressive offense and preparing a strong defense. Right now we need a defensive force capable of restoring law and order in a major American city during a disaster. Today, that force is stretched to the breaking point.
To provide better relief supplies in future disasters, the Department of Homeland Security should establish regional stockpiles of food, water and medical supplies within two hours flight time from every American metropolitan area with a population of 50,000 people or more. Federal funding for disaster relief should not have to wait until Congress comes back from vacation. Instead, Congress should set aside and maintain a $10 billion fund to be made available and applied immediately on order of the President, in the case of a catastrophic terrorist attack. Relief and recovery should wait for no politician.
To provide better synchronization of response and relief efforts, extensive planning and exercises should take place between state, local and national officials at every level well before the day of a disaster. Every American metropolitan region over 50,000 people should have in place a mass evacuation plan that has details on escapes routes to be established and safe destinations for civilian populations. Cities and states should have mutual aid agreements in place that specify what type of assistance they could rely on from neighbors. Let me give a local example.
Imagine a terrorist attack taking place in New London harbor that involved a radiological device and the release of dangerous chemicals. The city police and first responders of Groton and New London would know which roads to seal off and where to send traffic for evacuation. Connecticut State Police and U.S Coast Guard and Navy units would know the game plan and assist local first responders. City officials in Norwich and surrounding towns would know by their mutual aid agreements that they needed to prepare for the arrival of up to 20,000 temporary refugees while the Pequot and Mohegan authorities would prepare for the arrival another 25,000. Annual exercises would make it so that first responders and local officials could snap into action immediately, saving time and saving lives.
Republican U.S. Sen. David Vitter has said that the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina deserved an “F.” President Bush declared that the initial relief and response effort to Hurricane Katrina was inadequate. The next time an American city is threatened with destruction, we must be prepared, because next time, there may well be no warning.
Scott Bates is senior fellow for national security at the non-partisan Center for National Policy, and former senior policy adviser for the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee. He lives in Stonington.  © The Day Publishing Co., 2005 For home delivery, please call 1-866-846-9099 |